1. Environment:

     The Test field is the corridor out side the lab as before, and the max distance (end to end) is 55M. A metal door is open at 35M.

     We decide using 1st. antenna configuration for its  best performance. 

 

2. Test Result

      

             Range 30M

  Vertical
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg
1200bps Error Rate  % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2400bps Error Rate % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

      

Horizontal
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg.
1200bps Error Rate  % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2400bps Error Rate % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

           

            Range = 35M   

  Vertical
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg.
1200bps Error Rate  % 53 47 61 59 87 43 71 42 63 55 58.1
2400bps Error Rate % 62 47 31 85 43 87 49 87 41 64 59.6

 

Horizontal
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg.
1200bps Error Rate  % 4 4 2 3 5 4 7 3 3 2 3.7
2400bps Error Rate % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

       

            Range = 40 M

  Vertical
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg.
1200bps Error Rate  % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
2400bps Error Rate % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

 

Horizontal
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg
1200bps Error Rate  % 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.2
2400bps Error Rate % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  

                Range = 45 M   ( Vertical Polarization Fails to transmit after 40M) 

  Horizontal
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg.
1200bps Error Rate  % 7 1 2 4 5 0 1  7 6 0 3.3
2400bps Error Rate % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

       

                Range = 50 M

  Horizontal
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg.
1200bps Error Rate  % 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 2 2.2
2400bps Error Rate % 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.2

 

                Range = 55M

  Horizontal
Test Noumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg.
1200bps Error Rate  % 5 4 3 8 7 3 4 8 4 4 5.0
2400bps Error Rate % 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1

   

                                                   Horizontal Polarization                                                       

   

 Vertical  Polarization

 

 

 

3. IC-1000 Received Power,  55 M

Chart1. Horizontal Polarization

 

                                                                                                      Red curve is Max envelop

 

Chart2.  Vertical polarization

 

           Red curve is Max envelop

 

Chart3. Tx : Horizontal Rx: Vertical

 

                                                                                                              Green Curve only

 

4. Analysis

            1. As you can see, Vertical polarization fails to transmit after 35 M but Horizontal Polarization still works good. The reason should be the environment differences. In Vertical polarization, EM wave is reflected and deflect by more complicated surroundings  such as door,  , uneven sidewall, and  corridor branches. On the other hand, EM wave in Horizontal polarization is mostly reflected by ground and ceiling, which is a simpler environment. Complicated  surrounding will bring multi-path effect and results in inter-symbol noise which is really  detrimental to digital signal integrity.

            2. When we set Tx in Horizontal and Rx in Vertical (Chart3), the 2400 bps error rate is about 5% to 10 %. What should be noted is that although Rx power received in Chart3 (Horizontal to Vertical , -98dB)  is less than Chart2 ( Vertical to Vertical, -90dB), its error rate is much less than chart2 (fail to transmit). This implies received  power is not the only factor of error rate. Issues such as inter-symbol  mentioned above should be taken into consideration too.

            3. Another observation is : Error rate of 1200bps is greater than 2400bps.  A possible is the bandwidth (baseband) set in Rx is good for 2400 bps, but too large for 1200 bps. Larger bandwidth might bring noise which might interferes signal integrity. Further experiment should be done to prove this.

 

5. Power Consumption:

   

Mode

Current

Voltage Power
Rx (StandBy) 13.434 mA 6V 80.604 mW
Rx 13.278 mA 6V 79.668 mW
Tx (StandBy) 12 mA 3V 36 mW(@2400 bps)
Tx 36 mA 3V 108 mW(@2400 bps)

-